“I am glad to announce that there is progress in this direction. The Eurasian Congress of Philosophy is scheduled in February 2024. This event will be different from already organized world and Russian philosophical congresses. There is such hope and almost certainty that we will be able to coincide with this congress the award ceremony of the philosophy prize,” he told RIA Novosti.
“Modern Russian philosophical studies on current issues of philosophy and high-quality translations will be noticed. As you may know, a high-quality translation into Russian of an ancient text or classical monument is no less difficult than writing an independent work, and is considered to be a separate philosophical project. Moreover, there may also be awards in nominations related to the popularization of philosophy and media projects: websites, podcasts, radio and television programs on philosophy,” said the philosopher.
“There will also be a problem of a dialogue or a clash of civilizations. We will talk about the idea of Eurasia and the Eurasian project, which was expressed immediately after the revolution by young Russian thinkers in exile - N. Trubetskoy, P. Savitsky, P. Suvchinsky and others. We will discuss the Russian idea: this phrase was introduced into a broad ideological context by Nikolai Aleksandrovich Berdyaev, this is the title of his work written in the 1940s. We will also talk about postmodernity, traditional values and neoliberal ethics, which are promoted by certain circles in the West,” the dean of the philosophical faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University told RIA Novosti.
“Our opponents sometimes have the idea that only those who have left Russia can engage in independent philosophy. But in Russia you cannot engage in independent philosophy. I am deeply convinced that we still have both the opportunities and conditions for that. Today, these conditions are turning into demands in the face of confrontations, threats, anxiety and tragedy in the modern world. This is a philosophical challenge that we must respond to, and not to respond opportunistically, ideologically and situationally, but to respond deeply, as, for example, the thinkers of Russia and the Russian diaspora did after the events of 1917,” concluded Alexey Kozyrev.